Professor | Posted: 21:49:06 31st Oct 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
I agree. You said it much better than I did, but the thought is similar to my thoughts as well.
|
Bert2 | Posted: 08:28:36 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
No one should have to have a HW. If you want to be a pirate or someone else who want to be a rogue, fine you will not greatly effect the game or ever win the round. No player in the Old Sl without a HW won a round. But the major attackers need to have a HW. If not then No one will it would be silly. FLAT OUT. If you want to attack HW's you need to have a HW to be attacked. ANd as for everyone who razed theirs to the ground good for them they gained alot of points.
|
Arcanix | Posted: 09:27:55 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
then for you the problem are the points? |
Bert2 | Posted: 09:47:53 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
Yes, that is where the problem ultimately lies. Everything is done for the points. Everyone wants to win don't they. And shouldn't everyone have the same chances to win as everyone else?
|
Professor | Posted: 11:59:35 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Yes, they should. And, you are also right that fighting without any HW does seem unsustainable. Yes, there should be a limit on points you can get in a round for attacking.
|
Arcanix | Posted: 12:37:24 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
i don't agree with any of the ideias above, also i don't agree with empire points and atatck points |
Professor | Posted: 13:37:23 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Okay, don't agree. No everyone has to agree. Enough players have to agree to make it worth doing, but not everyone has to agree.
|
Professor | Posted: 13:38:45 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Personally, I don't agree with allowing the game to decay either. We have much less building than attacking now. Bert is right. We have a problem, and it needs to be fixed. Not agreeing is fine, so long as you have a viable alternative solution that other players agree is better.
|
Arcanix | Posted: 13:51:57 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
proffessor, i already said i like bert ideia, but now you want to have empire points, and attack points???also transfering ships from one hw to another??, have you though on that for a moment?, i just need to get a transport move resources from a planet to another, so that im able to move a ship??,i really don't see the point on this |
Professor | Posted: 14:34:29 1st Nov 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
We have points for having resources already now. That change was approved by SL council, but some players have suggested we split out points separately so we can see points from holding assets clearly differentiated from points for attacking and destroying assets.
|