Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Underhog | Posted: 22:55:04 27th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 375 Topics: 32 Location: United States Gender: Male |
Oh, well, ah I don't read unless I'm forced to anyway... Even tho my elementary scholl said that I had a vocabulary off the charts
|
erectiledisfunction | Posted: 23:16:21 27th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 710 Topics: 52 Location: United States Gender: Male |
sorry but they are nukes my freind.... id tell you the name but i cant remember.... just a sec
|
erectiledisfunction | Posted: 23:18:22 27th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 710 Topics: 52 Location: United States Gender: Male |
B61-11, an earth-penetrating nuclear device known as the "bunker buster."
|
erectiledisfunction | Posted: 23:25:44 27th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 710 Topics: 52 Location: United States Gender: Male |
3 of them equal one hiroshima bomb
|
bdsm99 | Posted: 09:21:23 28th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 139 Topics: 19 Location: United States Gender: Male |
there are mininukes in development that have not been approved for combat, because it is feared that if used it would lower the standards needed for the use of a nuclear device of any type, currently that standard has stood since WWII and states that they should only be used in the event that a convential assautls would results in hundreds of thousands to millions of casualties on both sides, as was the case with an invasion of Japan, their are also convential bunker buster which can bury themselves in between 20 and 100feet of concrete before detonating. Also radiation cannot be contained, it can penetrate though even several cm of lead or several meters of concrete. Therefore the radiation will not be contained in the event one is used in fact the mini-nukes are classified as tactical not strategic because they have been designed to reduce the destructive fireball and increase radiation output. A more effective way of eliminating armies as the radiation spreads. That is completely factual and unbiased facts are facts, no mininukes have been used, convential bunker busters have, mininukes have been in development for a while Im not sure but I believe it started with Reagan and was continued by both Bush sr and Clinton and now bush jr
|
erectiledisfunction | Posted: 12:32:11 28th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 710 Topics: 52 Location: United States Gender: Male |
bunker busters are the mini-nukes... they are one and the same
|
bdsm99 | Posted: 12:40:26 28th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 139 Topics: 19 Location: United States Gender: Male |
no they are not, their are convential bunker busters and mini nukes, the convential bunker busters have depleted uranium in them to add density for going deeper into the ground, but they are not nukes that release widespread amounts of radiation, applying that standard all tank shells are nukes as they are filled with depleted uranium as well.
|
erectiledisfunction | Posted: 13:04:00 28th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 710 Topics: 52 Location: United States Gender: Male |
k whatever... did you hear that there was a mole in the pentagon the whole time.... hehe thats funny our government is too busy watching us to catch a mole in the pentagon
|
bdsm99 | Posted: 13:07:14 28th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 139 Topics: 19 Location: United States Gender: Male |
lol damn patriot act, its a shame they strip us of our liberties to protect em, I guess if there are fewer of them its easier to protect em.
|
bdsm99 | Posted: 13:09:26 28th Aug 2004 |
Posts: 139 Topics: 19 Location: United States Gender: Male |
course its been done throughout history starting with the 2nd pres of the US Federalist John Adams with the sedition acts
|