Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
me naam is m | Posted: 10:59:05 24th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 985 Topics: 37 Location: Netherlands Gender: Male |
No, more to clean inactive ships up.
|
cork | Posted: 12:09:46 24th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 393 Topics: 17 Location: United States Gender: Male |
Inactive ships? Wha? You want what to happen to inactive ships? You want aliens to take them or you want aliens to attack inactives in order to delete them?
|
me naam is m | Posted: 12:19:07 24th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 985 Topics: 37 Location: Netherlands Gender: Male |
yes, I want aliens to attack inactives' ships to take them over so others can pirate or destroy 'em. then, after a while, if it hasn't been destroyed, it 'disappears'.
|
cork | Posted: 15:23:24 24th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 393 Topics: 17 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I think I'd prefer aliens stick to planets. With defense on inactives' hws decreasing, they should be eventually defeated and their ships deleted.
|
TallDude3rd | Posted: 03:20:38 25th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 1850 Topics: 37 Location: Netherlands Gender: Male |
yeah, ships need to be left alone, you can always click your way through the universe to find them
|
me naam is m | Posted: 07:15:40 25th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 985 Topics: 37 Location: Netherlands Gender: Male |
I think Troops and Energy should crumble faster than non-defence. that way it would get even more attractive to crash assaults.
|
cork | Posted: 08:18:50 25th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 393 Topics: 17 Location: United States Gender: Male |
It does.
|
me naam is m | Posted: 13:54:38 25th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 985 Topics: 37 Location: Netherlands Gender: Male |
Oh, didn't read that anywhere. My bad, probably.
|
cork | Posted: 14:22:59 25th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 393 Topics: 17 Location: United States Gender: Male |
Wasn't even sure of the rates myself. Figured I'd look them up.
|
EL | Posted: 15:32:24 25th Aug 2010 |
Posts: 1705 Topics: 182 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
It will take some doing and testing but it will be implemented |