PUBLIC FORUMS/SEEK AND DESTROY FORUM

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Next

me naam is m Posted: 10:59:05 24th Aug 2010

Posts: 985

Topics: 37

Location: Netherlands

Gender: Male



No, more to clean inactive ships up.




__________________________
Where has the rum gone!?

cork Posted: 12:09:46 24th Aug 2010

Posts: 393

Topics: 17

Location: United States

Gender: Male



Inactive ships? Wha? You want what to happen to inactive ships? You want aliens to take them or you want aliens to attack inactives in order to delete them?




__________________________
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
Just when you finally make something idiot-proof, someone goes and builds a bigger idiot.
http://www.something.com

me naam is m Posted: 12:19:07 24th Aug 2010

Posts: 985

Topics: 37

Location: Netherlands

Gender: Male



yes, I want aliens to attack inactives' ships to take them over so others can pirate or destroy 'em. then, after a while, if it hasn't been destroyed, it 'disappears'.




__________________________
Where has the rum gone!?

cork Posted: 15:23:24 24th Aug 2010

Posts: 393

Topics: 17

Location: United States

Gender: Male



I think I'd prefer aliens stick to planets. With defense on inactives' hws decreasing, they should be eventually defeated and their ships deleted.




__________________________
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
Just when you finally make something idiot-proof, someone goes and builds a bigger idiot.
http://www.something.com

TallDude3rd Posted: 03:20:38 25th Aug 2010

Posts: 1850

Topics: 37

Location: Netherlands

Gender: Male



yeah, ships need to be left alone, you can always click your way through the universe to find them ;)

Aliens stick to SPC HW's (wether it is in the news or not) and the res on inactive player HW's crumbles down. That's how we are going to clean up slowly!




__________________________
UNOFFICIAL BIG KAHUNA OF THE UNIVERSE

me naam is m Posted: 07:15:40 25th Aug 2010

Posts: 985

Topics: 37

Location: Netherlands

Gender: Male



I think Troops and Energy should crumble faster than non-defence. that way it would get even more attractive to crash assaults.




__________________________
Where has the rum gone!?

cork Posted: 08:18:50 25th Aug 2010

Posts: 393

Topics: 17

Location: United States

Gender: Male



It does.




__________________________
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
Just when you finally make something idiot-proof, someone goes and builds a bigger idiot.
http://www.something.com

me naam is m Posted: 13:54:38 25th Aug 2010

Posts: 985

Topics: 37

Location: Netherlands

Gender: Male



Oh, didn't read that anywhere. My bad, probably.




__________________________
Where has the rum gone!?

cork Posted: 14:22:59 25th Aug 2010

Posts: 393

Topics: 17

Location: United States

Gender: Male



Wasn't even sure of the rates myself. Figured I'd look them up.

- Upon 2 months of not logging in any resources over 1M will begin to deplete at a rate of 0.5% per day for defensive and 0.15% for non-def.

http://www.skylords.com/com/49027/topic/SL-Meeting-Outcome

I don't think this has been implemented yet. But it will be.




__________________________
Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
Just when you finally make something idiot-proof, someone goes and builds a bigger idiot.
http://www.something.com

EL Posted: 15:32:24 25th Aug 2010

Posts: 1705

Topics: 182

Location: United Kingdom

Gender: Male



It will take some doing and testing but it will be implemented


Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Next

PUBLIC FORUMS
TICKETS
LANGUAGE FORUMS
SKYLORDS CHAT