Topic Title: THE REAL STORY BEHIND 9/11 (THIS IS A MUST SEE FOR EVERYONE) (Simple Topic)
Topic starter: ReaperOfSouls90
Topic started: 20:34:56 19th Dec 2006
Posts: 63 Last post: 15:27:10 31st Dec 2006 by ReaperOfSouls90
| ReaperOfSouls90 | Posted: 20:34:56 19th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 11365 Topics: 75 Location: United States Gender: Male |
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change+recut
|
| General Stonewall | Posted: 21:38:39 19th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 2187 Topics: 23 Location: Costa Rica Gender: Male |
Bunch of Crap!
|
| ReaperOfSouls90 | Posted: 22:02:32 19th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 11365 Topics: 75 Location: United States Gender: Male |
only to someone who is simple minded and doesnt leave room for what if
|
| General Stonewall | Posted: 23:45:28 19th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 2187 Topics: 23 Location: Costa Rica Gender: Male |
Bunch of hippy non-sence, anyone who believes must not have much of a mind.
|
| ReaperOfSouls90 | Posted: 23:58:44 19th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 11365 Topics: 75 Location: United States Gender: Male |
explain y u say this.. cuz i can explain exactly y i think this is a well organized document stating the truth...
|
| General Stonewall | Posted: 00:10:14 20th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 2187 Topics: 23 Location: Costa Rica Gender: Male |
Crap time change now I gotta re-write.
|
| ReaperOfSouls90 | Posted: 00:38:10 20th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 11365 Topics: 75 Location: United States Gender: Male |
u say they lack scientific consideration? lol r u kidding me?... in that video they prove every scientific thing to a t.... they pull out the table of elements and show exactly how much a substance can burn and at wat tempatures... they use experts on every point.. i admit some of it prolly doesnt mean anything.. but most of it does.. and it all points to the same stuff... like when their talkin bout the pentagon... how could a bowing 747 crash into that building by bouncing off the ground (stated by us government) and then ramming into the side.. yet there b no trails on the ground and only 1 16ft wide hole in the building... they scientifically proved that the gas in that plane would not b able to burn hot enough to disinigrate all of that steel and titanium... and as for having my mind set... my mind is never set.. im agnostic.. i always leave room for the other side of the arguement... present me with some kind of fact that proves wat they are saying is fake or wrong
|
| General Stonewall | Posted: 00:49:30 20th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 2187 Topics: 23 Location: Costa Rica Gender: Male |
They fail to take into consideration the reaction of the metale under stress. If you weaken the structure of a building by bending even the slightest little bit of structure, (which the crash obviosly did), you don't need to completely melt the metal, any adition of heat to the wewakend structure would cause the seer weight of the tower to be displaced. Just by the basic priciples of physics we know that the momentume of downward accelerating portions of the towers after the additon of evern a little heat caused its ingegrity to fail would be enought o demolish the rest of the building which it did.
|
| ReaperOfSouls90 | Posted: 00:59:26 20th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 11365 Topics: 75 Location: United States Gender: Male |
first off... did u even watch the whole thing? cuz as for the weakening metal... first of all they showed at least 15 other instances in which skyscrapers flimsier then the twin towers had withstood the burning heat and stayed standing... you say the downward thrust would buckle the beams.. but in the last one of those they show a skyscraper in spain or somewhere and it burned for 24 HOURS and the top 20 floors COLLAPSED ... wouldnt the metal be even weaker having burned for that long and then have 20 floors collapse onto it make the building fall? but hey it didnt.. the only 3 skyscraper collapse in the world from flames and being hit from a plain were all that same day... and the twin towers were built specifically to withstand such thing... "As for the pentagon as their isn't any video to review".... the us government seized those 2 security cam tapes that caught it all on film within minutes of the explosion... and only just recently have they released some of it and when they did they only released 4 frames.. which by examination never had any bowing 747 flying into the pentagon.. all there was was the couple miliseconds before the crash then boom theres an explosion outa nowhere... and btw.. a 500 ton (or however big they said it was) bowing 747 will not neatly skip across the ground without leaving any marks lol... they showed a video and a picture of other bowing 747s that had done the same thing suposedly and they leave huge gashes in the earth... the plane was also scientifically provin not to have been able to free-fall that fast... and even if it miracly happened it wouldnt have been able to "skip" across the grass and into the pentagon without harming 1 single leaf blade
|
| ReaperOfSouls90 | Posted: 01:03:06 20th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 11365 Topics: 75 Location: United States Gender: Male |
well i gotta get to bed.. ill reply to ur comment tomarrow after school... night
|
| General Stonewall | Posted: 01:09:57 20th Dec 2006 |
Posts: 2187 Topics: 23 Location: Costa Rica Gender: Male |
The pentagon depends, if an inexpecerienced pilot trie to place the place down dead center it would be very easy t simply hit the pavement ontside of wher it hit causeing only debits from the plane to penitrate it instead of the entire plane along with fuel. I don't blame the government for withholding the tapes I would have done the same
|
