Iiridayn | Posted: 12:03:12 24th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1643 Topics: 98 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I think you seriously missed the point. Like, you missed both the point and the metaphorical object upon which the point resides ;P. I summed it up thus: "So age and computers are clearly not mutually exclusive". I proved this by providing several counter examples. I could also point out to you that while I know less about medicine than some (this will likely change in the future, as I'm planning to go into medical nanotechnology), I'm confident that I can find a programmer somewhere that also has an M.D.
|
MageofMaddness | Posted: 14:06:23 24th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1610 Topics: 121 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I feel you also missed my point. I go twhat youre saying but in essence you reposted exactly what Im trying to say..... " Most accomplishments are first realized long before they're common."...... so by your own reasoning..... it is then safe to say that computers a in general, are "new"..... and claasifying logically based on the term "new"..... its means NOT Old.... as in time past which is equivalent to years..... so no knowing how to use a computer has nothing directly to do with How Old you are per say..... but seeing as how computers are a "generally" new item... it would logically mean that the "youner" aka. "newer" generation would know more about computers and logically have more exposure to computers than "older" folk.... older not directly reffering to your age but what "time period" youre from..... which would then logically make you "older" in years....... .....
|
Shadow Stalker | Posted: 14:12:15 24th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 11468 Topics: 322 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
but the older folk are the people who create the newer things so hence they know more about the new things than the new people
|
Iiridayn | Posted: 17:59:49 24th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1643 Topics: 98 Location: United States Gender: Male |
And I proffered a single counter example ;P. You should admit that they exist, at least . (Which, as stated, is and was my point). Simple enough for you?
|
Moiare | Posted: 00:57:16 25th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 135 Topics: 6 Location: United States Gender: Male |
Can't we just go back to arguing about credits?
|
kotica | Posted: 09:28:01 25th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 935 Topics: 84 Location: United States Gender: Male |
And thanks for bringing us back to topic Moiare. Only 40 posts? sounds like a symptom of malnourishment. :spam: twice a day, and you'll have it up in no time.
|
Berserkas | Posted: 11:34:05 25th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1515 Topics: 32 Gender: Male |
i play just for the heck of it
|
MinderBinder | Posted: 12:05:36 25th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1599 Topics: 54 Location: United States Gender: Male |
good enough reason for me
|
Rukna Baisioji Akis | Posted: 16:14:24 25th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1374 Topics: 103 Location: Lithuania Gender: Male |
"Mostly because I disagree with RBA's position that the game is all about points, who has the most. Sure, Skylords pays the winners of a few specific stat leaders at the end of the round. But, thats not why I play."
|
Shadow Stalker | Posted: 16:21:53 25th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 11468 Topics: 322 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
well if u beat them then u can feel really proud of urself and they can feel ashamed
|