Hope | Posted: 08:27:43 1st Mar 2006 |
Posts: 6522 Topics: 415 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
I agree with SF
|
mehdec | Posted: 19:32:01 1st Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1152 Topics: 87 Gender: Male |
Ha down with the points is alright but there should be more opportunities for making recs. Like there used to bea profit in training 2500 exp assaults. Dont know exactly how but maybe production buildings on planets that gain exp and build better ships with more exp.
|
Zerohours | Posted: 15:31:50 4th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 2443 Topics: 287 Location: Canada Gender: Male |
ok hows thi you bunch of poeepl that want to play teh game against yourselves
|
MageofMaddness | Posted: 17:49:54 4th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 1610 Topics: 121 Location: United States Gender: Male |
OK I agree with Neg and Thabim on everyting they say..... also I Love Tarog's idea..... though as SF pointed out indirectly..... you really dont need the chart as Tarog stated because if youre willin gto do a little brain work based on how many plannets owned plannets captured and points gained theres already an indication in hte form Tarog suggested but I still Like Tarogs Idea malkes it a lot Easier rather than going through player profiles and comparing ratios.....
|
Moiare | Posted: 19:50:25 4th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 135 Topics: 6 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I worry about reducing interest and points for resources for one reason.
|
Professor | Posted: 19:59:44 4th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Changing points is complex, and probably too radical a change given the power of shields now.
|
Bert2 | Posted: 20:31:14 4th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I say we get rid of points for resources and keep the intrest that way they intrest is plowed into assault and attacks and we can still keep Hw's around for the increase in amount of troops available to attack with. This way we keep a lid on cheap points, and award our attackers.
|
iii2 | Posted: 21:10:43 5th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 207 Topics: 24 Location: India |
If the interest is going to be there it should be on all resources whether defensive or non-defensive.
|
Bert2 | Posted: 21:20:35 5th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
Sure, I agree. I just do not want points for Holding Resources. Especially Definsive resources. Now non defensive I can see because if you hold alot of those it makes you a target and is worth it for the risk, but the defensive resources gives you double, The def and the points.
|
iii2 | Posted: 21:27:07 5th Mar 2006 |
Posts: 207 Topics: 24 Location: India |
But again defensive resources give points. Non Defensive resources dont. So again if points should be given they should be for all resources. Uniformity should be maintained. |