swimerdude62 | Posted: 11:09:38 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 1874 Topics: 127 Gender: Male |
resource wise but yes there are the other benefits.
|
Professor | Posted: 11:17:04 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Well, so much for Filas arguement that HWs are too safe, and that no one would capture any HWs this round.
|
Hope | Posted: 11:18:57 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 6522 Topics: 415 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
Yea i wouldnt let watupdogg attack until he had 450 fighters ready
|
Filas | Posted: 11:59:16 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 2042 Topics: 148 Location: Lithuania |
"How did we lose out ?
|
Arcanix | Posted: 12:03:49 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
you have a point, however you must think YOU lost 60M T and several TS members lost 120M T, not exactly the same thing |
Hope | Posted: 12:05:21 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 6522 Topics: 415 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
And res isnt everything
|
Filas | Posted: 12:14:02 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 2042 Topics: 148 Location: Lithuania |
well, I'm not telling that I can win against a big clan alone
|
Arcanix | Posted: 12:18:36 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
well, then you must think TS "LOST" troops but got points, SC lost troops.
|
GholaBashar | Posted: 12:44:48 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 1246 Topics: 68 Location: Romania |
Filas is, of course, correct. it always costs more to attack and loot never makes up for the expenditure. but this is the only way to win rounds. what were they supposed to do? round up that huge fleet next to your HW and PM you with "bang, you;re dead!" ?
|
Hope | Posted: 13:47:30 7th Jan 2006 |
Posts: 6522 Topics: 415 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
|