| Bert2 | Posted: 08:11:13 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
What are you guys talking about. I'm sure that there is no HW problem. You guys are just making up a problem that isn't going to happen.
|
| Naltsa Abe | Posted: 08:50:34 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 1600 Topics: 236 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
Err right
|
| toXin | Posted: 08:54:45 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 34 Topics: 7 Gender: Male |
some time past since HW and ship issue was changed
|
| Bert2 | Posted: 09:10:28 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
ok does that mean we can't change things again?
|
| Naltsa Abe | Posted: 09:14:46 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 1600 Topics: 236 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
I don't understand why nobody wants the old way back, sure it wasn't fawless but we had balance, Its like you design a circuit and it does exactly what you want but something is wrong in the internal logic, do you change it? I don't think so
|
| Bert2 | Posted: 09:35:47 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I really do not want ships assigned to a pklanet any more than most and for the same reason. That would be a simple solution but also the most painful.
|
| Arcanix | Posted: 09:42:47 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
thast why i like my solution |
| Professor | Posted: 10:03:18 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
LOL - everyone likes "their" solution and many people dislike all proposed solutions. I think a vote is the best way to solve the debate myself. Let the community as a whole decide.
|
| Bert2 | Posted: 10:04:35 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2477 Topics: 101 Location: United States Gender: Male |
I agree.
|
| Arcanix | Posted: 10:08:13 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
|