Topic Title: Homeworlds (Simple Topic)
Topic starter: Naltsa Abe
Topic started: 21:16:36 15th Dec 2005
Posts: 31 Last post: 14:54:34 20th Dec 2005 by Arcanix
Naltsa Abe | Posted: 21:16:36 15th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 1600 Topics: 236 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
Right, once upon a time homeworlds where a place to hold resources, troops, energy.
|
Professor | Posted: 22:18:52 15th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Iiridayn's solution proposed was similar to this, but did not even result in immediate loss of the ships, but only revealing their coords to the player defeating the planet. This might give a player time to move the ships before fighters could arrive, and well defended transports might not even be attacked (although they would be pirated).
|
andy1218 | Posted: 22:19:33 15th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2768 Topics: 75 Location: Canada Gender: Male |
sounds good...
|
mythics | Posted: 23:11:17 15th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 851 Topics: 69 Location: United States Gender: Male |
not really, its still very simple
|
Professor | Posted: 07:05:26 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Resource caps are not going to be raised above 15M. The 16,777,215 is a hard coded cap in the game, and is a stupid number to have as a cap (hard to remember for most people), so the cap will stay at 15M (other than possibly allowing interest on resources to exceed that number as long as it is below the 16.7M number, if we implement interest on resources on planets).
|
AGUX | Posted: 07:12:50 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2908 Topics: 116 Location: Lithuania Gender: Male |
Maybe we need no "cap" for none defence resources? 15M only for E and T ...
|
Dios | Posted: 07:13:33 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2511 Topics: 165 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
How about a cap of 16m instead and then the interest going up to 16.7
|
Professor | Posted: 07:27:05 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
16.7M is the cap. The code does not allow larger numbers as it is. It was designed for no numbers being allowed greater than 16.7M. And, anyone who wants to store more than 16.7M non-defense resources on a single planet is ... well, nuts. You are just asking for trouble.
|
toXin | Posted: 07:42:50 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 34 Topics: 7 Gender: Male |
one question.
|
Dios | Posted: 07:43:36 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2511 Topics: 165 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
That's why I said make the soft cap for resources up to 16m and allow resource interest payments up to 16.7m
|
Arcanix | Posted: 07:43:49 16th Dec 2005 |
Posts: 2036 Topics: 129 Location: Portugal Gender: Male |
at the moment you keep your ship |