Professor | Posted: 05:43:44 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Filas, in answer to your question, I counted you as a vet. I also counted SS as a vet. I did not just look at stars to determine vet versus newbie, but names of those voting.
|
Amidamaru | Posted: 05:54:07 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 2973 Topics: 230 Gender: Male |
im a new vet if that makes any sense
|
Professor | Posted: 07:06:35 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 5830 Topics: 405 Location: China Gender: Male ISP: MSN |
Okay. Your a newbie. I will admit it. I should not have counted you as a vet.
|
Chaos | Posted: 09:45:46 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 6679 Topics: 367 Location: Lithuania Gender: Male |
Just a second. So, it will cost 25 mil TROOPS to take out 20 mil DEFENCE planet. Attacker will loose 25 mil TROOPS. Defender will loose about 11 mil troops. That's 1:2.7 ratio. Did I get it right?
|
Voice of Filas | Posted: 10:04:04 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 308 Topics: 13 |
unfortunately shield will mean quite much to ratio, so ratio will be from 1:2.4 for 9x shield to 1:3.4 for 17x shield |
Chaos | Posted: 10:09:11 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 6679 Topics: 367 Location: Lithuania Gender: Male |
Not very much though, because it's 1+shield/10 now?
|
Amidamaru | Posted: 10:17:20 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 2973 Topics: 230 Gender: Male |
abes asked me to post why not limit production points to 16
|
Chaos | Posted: 10:23:05 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 6679 Topics: 367 Location: Lithuania Gender: Male |
I agree, tehre should be some kind of limit.
|
Voice of Filas | Posted: 10:34:38 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 308 Topics: 13 |
I was suggesting not limit production points, but limit of points which can be asigned to shield. I would sugeest 10x shield for easier calculations
|
Hope | Posted: 10:41:09 22nd May 2005 |
Posts: 6522 Topics: 415 Location: United Kingdom Gender: Male |
Yea that is dumb making attack that pointless lol
|